Cybersecurity / Scoping Checklist
Pentest scoping checklist
The questions a serious vendor will ask you anyway — answered before the first call. Fill this in and every quote you receive gets sharper, whoever you're evaluating.
Why scope before you shop
A penetration test is priced from its scope: what’s being tested, from what position, to produce what evidence. A vendor that quotes without asking detailed questions about your environment is pricing a scan, not a test — and a buyer who can’t answer those questions yet can’t compare the vendors who do ask.
This checklist is the preparation for that conversation. It’s vendor-neutral — work through it before talking to us or anyone else. Prefer paper? There’s a print-friendly PDF version, ungated.
The checklist
- 01
Inventory the attack surface
Effort follows attack surface, so a real quote requires understanding yours. List what exists before deciding what's in scope.
- Web applications and thick clients in scope — names, URLs, and the environments they run in
- APIs — specifications or collections (e.g. Swagger/OpenAPI) you can share, plus any endpoints consumers use that aren't documented
- Mobile apps — platforms and builds, and where the app's backend boundary sits
- Network scope — external ranges, internal segments, and which perspective (outside, inside, or both) you need tested
- Cloud estate — accounts, services, and the data flows between them
- Explicitly out of scope — the systems a tester must not touch, written down
- 02
Roles, tenants, and access
Findings depend on the position the tester starts from. Decide what access you'll grant and which boundaries matter.
- User roles to test — which roles, and test accounts for each
- Tenant boundaries — if the product is multi-tenant, whether cross-tenant isolation is in scope
- Environment under test — production or a staging replica, and how test data is handled
- Credentials and access method the testers will receive — and for cloud, whether that's read-only credentials plus a set of agreed active tests
- 03
Compliance drivers and evidence
If an audit is behind the test, the framework shapes the scope. Know what evidence you need out before anyone quotes.
- Which framework is driving the test — SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR — and the audit or deadline date
- SOC 2: whether you're facing a Type 1 (point in time) or Type 2 (review period) — testing has to land accordingly
- PCI DSS: Requirement 11.4 expects external and internal testing at least annually and after significant changes, segmentation testing where segmentation shrinks your scope, and a tester independent of the systems under test
- HIPAA: where ePHI lives and moves — the applications, APIs, integrations, and infrastructure your risk analysis answers for
- The evidence you need out of the test — what your auditor, customer, or security questionnaire actually asks for
- 04
Rules of engagement and logistics
Agree the ground rules in writing before testing begins — every serious vendor will expect these questions.
- Exclusions — e.g. denial of service, or phishing/social engineering unless explicitly agreed
- Testing windows — when testing may run, and any change-freeze periods to avoid
- Escalation contacts — who the testers call when something critical surfaces, and the channel for day-to-day contact
- NDA and communication channels — agreed before any testing starts
- Who receives findings and the report — and how long the vendor may retain them
- 05
Report and retest expectations
The report is the product. Set expectations for it — and for verification of fixes — before you compare quotes.
- Report audiences — an executive summary leadership can read, plus technical findings with reproduction steps and evidence
- Severity model — findings rated on a stated rubric (e.g. CVSS-based bands), with remediation guidance per finding
- Retest — included in the quoted price or extra, within what window, and whether the final report is updated to reflect verified fixes
- Cadence — one-time assessment or recurring cycles, and what triggers a re-test (releases, infrastructure change, annual baseline)
- A sample report — ask every vendor for a redacted sample before you sign
Take it with you
The PDF version is a direct download — no form, no gate — sized to print and fill in with the team that owns each answer.
When you’re comparing vendors, scoping rigor is criterion five in our guide to choosing a penetration testing vendor — and what the resulting deliverable should contain is walked through in inside a penetration-testing report. How our own engagements run is on the methodology page. We revise this checklist as the published scoping guidance evolves — for updates, subscribe to Updates from the practice in the footer.
Ready to scope the work?
A 30-minute call with the engineers who will do the testing — not a sales gate.