Full-scope manual testing
Web, API, mobile, thick-client, network, and cloud — tested by hand by senior engineers, with tooling for coverage and humans for the logic flaws tools can't reason about.
Cybersecurity · Security Testing
A pentest that's still true next quarter
Your environment changes every sprint; a once-a-year PDF doesn't. Penetration Testing as a Service replaces the annual scramble with a standing program: senior testers, recurring cycles, retest included — evidence that stays current with your product.
Independent quality engineering & cybersecurity since 2020 — 100+ security & quality engineers, delivering on platforms we build and run ourselves.
IBM puts the average cost of a US data breach at $10.22M (2025). The findings that cause breaches are usually reachable months before — in code that shipped after your last pentest report was filed.
See a redacted sample report
The structure, depth, and remediation detail your team will receive — client identity and evidence removed.
A year in the program
What a standing engagement looks like over time
A one-time pentest is a snapshot. A program is a moving picture — here is how a typical year runs, so your auditors and your engineers always have current evidence.
Kickoff
Scope with the testers, not a sales desk
Targets, rules of engagement, and the evidence you need out are agreed directly with the senior engineers who will do the work. Access and comms channels are set up securely.
Each cycle
Assess → report → retest
Manual, OWASP/PTES/NIST SP 800-115-aligned testing of the in-scope surface. Critical findings are raised the day they're found; the cycle ends with a retest-verified report.
Between cycles
New scope on demand
Ship a new application or API? It's added to the program and assessed without a new procurement round — coverage tracks your release cadence, not your contract calendar.
Ongoing
Evidence that stays current
Each cycle refreshes the evidence auditors and customers ask for, so a security questionnaire is answered from a current report — never a year-old PDF.
What a testing cycle actually delivers
Exploit-verified findings
Every reported finding is demonstrated, not asserted: reproduction steps, evidence, and real impact — no scanner-export padding.
Retest included
Fixes are verified and the report updated. Your auditor gets 'remediated and retested,' not 'reported.'
Compliance-focused scoping
Testing shaped to the evidence GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, or ISO 27001 auditors actually request.
How it’s delivered
01
Scope
A scoping call with the testers themselves — targets, rules of engagement, and what evidence you need out.
02
Test
Manual assessment aligned to OWASP, PTES, and NIST SP 800-115, with daily contact for critical findings.
03
Report
Findings ranked by exploitability and impact, each with reproduction and remediation guidance.
04
Retest
Verification of fixes and an updated report — the cycle then repeats on your release cadence.
Tools & standards
- Tooling
- Burp Suite Pro, OWASP ZAP, Nmap, Nessus, Nuclei, SecurityTrails
- Methodology
- OWASP Testing Guide, PTES, NIST SP 800-115; retest policy standard
- Team
- 63% of engineers certified — CISSP, CEH, eCPPT, ISTQB, AWS
What you receive
- Executive summary your board can read
- Technical findings with reproduction steps and evidence
- Remediation guidance ranked by exploitability, not CVSS alone
- Retest verification and an audit-ready final report
Evidence
JWT “none”-algorithm bypass
In one web vulnerability assessment and penetration test (VAPT) we demonstrated full authentication bypass via unsigned JWTs, alongside a public S3 bucket and RBAC gaps — found, reported, verified fixed on retest.
Customer success →Three years, one client
“I have consistently witnessed their deep understanding of cybersecurity, timely delivery, and effective methodologies over three years of working together.” — Rajasekhara Saidam, Information Security Officer, HackerEarth
Engagement
Ways to engage the same senior bench
Buy it as a scoped project, embed it in your team, or run it as a managed service — same engineers, same governance, whichever shape fits.
Point-in-time assessment
A scoped, one-time pentest against a defined target with a full report and one retest — for a release gate, a customer requirement, or an annual baseline.
Standing program (PTaaS)
Recurring assessment cycles aligned to your release cadence, with retesting each cycle and evidence that stays current across surveillance audits.
On-demand scope additions
Add a new application, API, or environment to an existing program without re-contracting — scoped and started in days, not procurement cycles.
Who this is for
- CISOs replacing point-in-time pentests with a standing testing program
- CTOs facing a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 deadline who need credible testing evidence fast
- Product teams whose customers' security questionnaires demand recent pentest reports
Proven here
Teams we've delivered this for
- A finance & banking company
- A developer-assessment platform
- A banking-sector software provider
- A crypto trading & exchange platform
- An e-learning platform
- A cybersecurity partner
- An IT services & product company
- A home-healthcare provider
- A SaaS platform
- A technology product company
- A technology company
- A technology services firm
- A digital services firm
- A technology consultancy
- An enterprise IT environment
Engagements shown by industry; client identities are kept confidential.
Common questions
What do we receive at the end?
An executive summary written for a board, technical findings with reproduction steps and evidence, remediation guidance ranked by exploitability, and — after fixes — a retest-verified final report suitable for auditors and customers.
Can we see a sample report before engaging?
Yes — a redacted sample report is available to download on this page, so your team can assess our reporting depth, severity model, and remediation detail before committing.
Is retesting included?
Yes. Remediation of reported findings is verified and the report updated to 'remediated and retested' — the wording auditors expect. Retest scope and window are set in the engagement agreement.
Who actually does the work?
Senior engineers from our own bench — 63% hold industry certifications (CISSP, CEH, eCPPT, ISTQB, AWS). The people who scope your engagement are the people who run it; there is no rotating offshore bench behind the proposal.
Which methodologies do you follow?
Testing is aligned to the OWASP Testing Guide, PTES, and NIST SP 800-115. Reports map findings to the frameworks your auditors use (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR) where relevant.
How are our data and the findings handled?
Engagements run under NDA, and engineers who handle client data undergo background checks. Findings and reports are shared through channels agreed at scoping and are not retained beyond the period needed to deliver and support the engagement. Data-handling specifics — storage, encryption, retention, and destruction — are documented in your service agreement; see the Trust page for our posture.
One practice, not one vendor
This is one stage of a single assurance loop: findings become regression tests, and their indicators become live detections — so a problem, once fixed, can’t quietly come back. That’s what you get from one integrated partner that a stack of separate vendors can’t. See how the loop connects →
Ready to scope the work?
A 30-minute call with the engineers who will do the testing — not a sales gate.