Framework-mapped testing
Penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, and configuration reviews scoped to what your target framework requires — we test and report against GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 requirements.
Cybersecurity · Security Advisory
SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR — every framework eventually asks the same question: show us. We produce the security-testing evidence audits actually require, mapped to the controls they check, in the language auditors accept.
Independent quality engineering & cybersecurity since 2020 — 100+ security & quality engineers, delivering on platforms we build and run ourselves.
A failed or delayed audit stalls the deals that required it — enterprise procurement won't wait while you generate a year of missing evidence, and rushed remediation before a deadline costs multiples of steady preparation.
What the auditor gets
Every framework asks the same question in a different vocabulary: show us. This is what our testing produces against each — so you walk into the audit with the artifact, not a promise to generate one.
| Framework | What it asks of testing | Evidence we produce |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Security controls operate effectively over time | Recurring pentest + vulnerability-assessment reports, retest attestations, control-mapped findings |
| ISO 27001 | Risk-based controls, tested and reviewed | Assessment reports mapped to Annex A controls; remediation and retest evidence |
| PCI DSS | Segmentation and application security around cardholder data | Scoped penetration test of the CDE, segmentation validation, remediation verification |
| HIPAA | Safeguards protecting PHI across systems | Assessment of PHI-bearing web, API, and mobile surfaces with remediation guidance |
| GDPR | Appropriate technical measures for personal data | Security testing evidence of the technical measures protecting personal data |
Penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, and configuration reviews scoped to what your target framework requires — we test and report against GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 requirements.
Current controls versus framework requirements, with a sequenced remediation plan — before the auditor finds the gaps for you.
Reports structured for audit consumption: control mappings, retest attestations, and scope statements auditors can cite directly.
Recurring testing cycles that keep evidence current across surveillance audits and renewals — not an annual scramble.
01
Target framework, audit timeline, and required evidence identified.
02
Gap analysis against the framework's controls.
03
Security testing scoped to the framework's requirements.
04
Audit-ready reporting plus retest attestation.
Engagement
Buy it as a scoped project, embed it in your team, or run it as a managed service — same engineers, same governance, whichever shape fits.
A gap assessment against your target framework with a sequenced remediation plan — before the auditor arrives.
Framework-scoped testing that produces the specific evidence your audit requires, formatted for the auditor's checklist.
Recurring testing cycles that keep evidence current across surveillance audits and renewals.
No — and that distinction matters. We are an independent testing partner, not a certification body. We produce the security-testing evidence your auditor or certification body requires; the audit itself is issued by them. We hold no organizational certifications and never imply otherwise.
GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 — as client-side requirements we test and report against. Reports map findings to the specific controls each framework checks.
Yes. Remediation of reported findings is verified and the report updated to 'remediated and retested' — the wording auditors expect. Retest scope and window are set in the engagement agreement.
Engagements run under NDA, and engineers who handle client data undergo background checks. Findings and reports are shared through channels agreed at scoping and are not retained beyond the period needed to deliver and support the engagement. Data-handling specifics — storage, encryption, retention, and destruction — are documented in your service agreement; see the Trust page for our posture.
This is one stage of a single assurance loop: findings become regression tests, and their indicators become live detections — so a problem, once fixed, can’t quietly come back. That’s what you get from one integrated partner that a stack of separate vendors can’t. See how the loop connects →
A 30-minute call with the engineers who will do the testing — not a sales gate.